hybrido problem filling

User avatar
hervé
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:30 am

hybrido problem filling

Post by hervé » Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:56 pm

hello.. no matter what I try, I get these strange bars of particles.. any idea..

I tried with RF 2012, and no problem.. but with RF 2013.. no luck :|

Image

User avatar
LuisMiguel
Posts: 528
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 2:37 pm

Re: hybrido problem filling

Post by LuisMiguel » Thu Jul 18, 2013 11:25 am

Hi herve,

It seems be a bad voxelization with the geometry. Could you send me the scene and the SD to try here? I could tell you if there is something wrong.

Thanks

luisM.

User avatar
hervé
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:30 am

Re: hybrido problem filling

Post by hervé » Fri Jul 19, 2013 6:45 am

Hello Luis... I have managed to get it right... there was 3 flying lonely polygons.. I removed them, and perfect now.. But I wonder why it worked before with RF2012.. anyway, all good now.. 8-)

thanks

User avatar
tsn
Posts: 283
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 7:22 am

Re: hybrido problem filling

Post by tsn » Fri Jul 19, 2013 7:36 am

hervé wrote:But I wonder why it worked before with RF2012
Simply because Hybrido in 2012 was a totally different technology and not comparable to the FLIP solver in RF2013 ;)
Thomas Schlick | Next Limit Technologies

User avatar
hervé
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:30 am

Re: hybrido problem filling

Post by hervé » Sun Jul 21, 2013 7:49 am

ahh oki, I see... thanks tsn

User avatar
LuisMiguel
Posts: 528
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 2:37 pm

Re: hybrido problem filling

Post by LuisMiguel » Mon Jul 22, 2013 9:13 am

Hi herve,

tsn is right, thanks ;). Hybrido 1 and Hybrido 2 are not comparables because they are different technologies. So, Hybrido 1 was LBM and Hybrido 2 is flip, and the voxelization is different for each one.

luisM.

User avatar
hervé
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:30 am

Re: hybrido problem filling

Post by hervé » Tue Jul 23, 2013 11:59 am

oki doki... Luis, could we say that each Hybrido has its pros/cons.. or is the FLIP hybrido just better at everything .. (compared to the hybrido LBM) ?

h.

User avatar
LuisMiguel
Posts: 528
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 2:37 pm

Re: hybrido problem filling

Post by LuisMiguel » Wed Jul 24, 2013 7:52 am

Hi Herve,

Flip is better than LBM for many reasons. I mean, greater amount of particles, a better handle of the memory, and the detail you get with the Flip won't be never reached by the LBM. Flip has pros/cons as you said, but it will be always better than LBM.

luisM.

User avatar
hervé
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:30 am

Re: hybrido problem filling

Post by hervé » Wed Jul 24, 2013 8:33 am

oki. thanks Luis.. 8-) indeed for what I do now, maybe this extra detail with greater particles number and greater detail is a bit too much for my project... hehe.. but yes overall I found FLIP super awesome, although for now very "water" oriented, but maybe in future releases viscosity would be a nice re-addition 8-)

h/

User avatar
tsn
Posts: 283
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 7:22 am

Re: hybrido problem filling

Post by tsn » Wed Jul 24, 2013 10:56 am

Viscosity and surface tension will be added with next major release.
Thomas Schlick | Next Limit Technologies

Post Reply